Do you like game theory?
Let's say you can assume one of following three roles in the game of life.
(1) Enabler/helper/provider/giver
(2) Neutral/indifferent
(3) Naysayer/denier/refuser/taker
Which role would you assume to win the game?
Intuitively, role (1) Enabler/helper/provider/giver wins. And in real life, it seems (1) is winning, too, assuming you are enabling something positive (i.e. not enabling killing, robbing, destruction, or some sort of warfare).
Why? Because among the three the Enablers/helpers/providers/givers are the only people who generate something of value.
We live in a capitalistic society. The most primitive form of economy is, "you provide something (e.g. fish, meat), and get something (e.g. fruits, rice) in return". Later, money came in to mediate the process, and the lending and banking system complicated the appearance of the process. But the simplest form of economy remains the same, which is "give and take".
People who are Enablers/helpers/providers/givers are likely to get something in return. Others (the neutrals and naysayers) are not.
In the recent election, "jobs" were a big issue. But even when the overall economy is down, there are always some people who thrive. I bet they are the Enablers/helpers/providers/givers, who create something of value.
What would you enable/help/provide/give to others?
The Thanksgiving holiday is approaching. This is a good opportunity for me to ask myself whether I am more on the consumer's side or on the provider's side.
